“To hijack four big airliners within a few minutes and fly them into targets within a single hour and doing so on complicated flight routes! That is unthinkable, without backing from the secret apparatuses of state and industry.” - German intelligence official and Defense Ministry Secretary of State, Andreas Von Bulow, who wrote the book “The CIA and September 11.”
“The deathly precision of the attacks and the magnitude of planning would have required years of planning. Such a sophisticated operation would require the fixed frame of a state intelligence organization, something not found in a loose group, like the one led by the student Mohammed Atta in Hamburg.” - Eckehardt Werthebach, former president of Germany’s domestic intelligence service.
“Terrorists could not have carried out such an operation with four hijacked planes without the support of a secret service.” - Horst Ehmke, former coordinator of the West German secret services.
The question has come up: is there enough concrete evidence to convict any of the perpetrators behind 9/11, if the facts spread widely enough to begin calls for justice? It is important to remember that when you are busting a conspiratorial organization like the Mafia, you do not aim at the head on the most spectacular charges. You choose the easy to prove charges, such as tax evasion, even against underlings, in order to get people facing jail time so they will start talking.
Prime candidates for such charges are:
Rudy Giuliani for felony destruction of evidence at a crime scene, the 99.5% of the structural steel which he had sent to China to be melted. The steel would have confirmed, as aerial photography shows beyond a shadow of a doubt, that these were demolitions. You see the cleanly cut, uniform length pieces of steel scattered across the WTC complex. The official story says the steel got soft and buckled. But almost all the steel in the photo is perfectly straight, and cut straight across as by a demolition charge. The contracts for shipping the steel to China and India are signed by Giuliani’s agent under his authority as Mayor of New York. An open and shut case which could get him talking. (See: 9/11 Prosecution Plan: Start with Rudy Giuliani)
- Dick Cheney for failing to shoot down FLT 77 (or whatever it was) as it came in at the Pentagon, which they had locked on radar and about which an officer kept asking him “do the orders still stand?” This is nearly an hour after the second tower was hit and we knew we were under attack.
Norman Mineta, Secretary of Transportation, testimony to 9/11 Commission, 9/11 Commission Report pages 8-9:
[Mineta]: There was a young man who had come in and said to the vice president, “The plane is 50 miles out. The plane is 30 miles out.” And when it got down to, “The plane is 10 miles out,” the young man also said to the vice president, “Do the orders still stand?” And the vice president turned and whipped his neck around and said, “Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?” (See: HistoryCommons)
(9:38 a.m.-10:00 a.m.) September 11, 2001: Senior Officials Unable to Contact Defense Secretary Rumsfeld Immediately after the Pentagon was hit, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld left his office and headed to the crash scene (see 9:38 a.m. September 11, 2001). For the 20 minutes or so that he is gone, others are desperately trying to contact him. Among those seeking Rumsfeld are Stephen Cambone, his closest aide, who is currently in the Pentagon’s Executive Support Center (see Shortly After 9:03 a.m. September 11, 2001), and also the National Military Command Center (see 9:39 a.m. September 11, 2001).Officer Aubrey Davis of the Pentagon police, who is accompanying Rumsfeld, is receiving frantic calls over his radio saying, “Where’s the secretary? Where’s the secretary?” Davis is unable to answer these requests. He later recalls, “I kept saying, ‘We’ve got him,’ but the system was overloaded, everyone on the frequency was talking, everything jumbled, so I couldn’t get through and they went on asking.” A senior White House official, who is in its Situation Room trying to coordinate a response to the attacks, will later angrily condemn Rumsfeld for having been out of touch during such a critical period. He says, “What was Rumsfeld doing on 9/11? He deserted his post. He disappeared. The country was under attack. (See: HistoryCommons)
- Members of the first 9/11 Commission as accomplices in the cover up of the crime. Why did they exclude all testimony of firefighters and first responders of explosions rocking the buildings? Why did they exclude all evidence of thermitic compounds, which should have blown the roof off the investigation and started the immediate commencement of a criminal investigation? (See: Richard Gage letter to Congressman Robert Wexler)
These are solid charges they could be hauled into court on, with the objective of cutting deals to get them talking about who else was involved.
Sure, there is strong evidence it goes back to Mossad. Confirmed Mossad agents caught dancing and high-fiving as the towers burned, who had cameras trained on the towers BEFORE they were hit, were deported, possibly by Michael Chertoff who was head of the FBI’s criminal division. Imagine if Arabs had had cameras set up and focused on the towers before they were hit. They would be guaranteed rotting in Gitmo to this day.
But in order to get to foreign accomplices first we need to put the heat on our own traitors.
There are plenty of material witnesses, Dov Zakheim who “lost” the $2.3 trillion from the Pentagon and invented remote hijack technology, and who comes from a family of known terrorists; Dr. Steven Pieczenik who says a general on Paul Wolfowitz’s staff confirmed it was a false flag, and will say it in open court; all the Neocon members of Project for a New American Century, who dreamed of “a new Pearl Harbor” so we could invade the Middle East.
Project for a New American Century would be fertile ground for material witnesses. The dual citizen Neocons in the Bush administration had been dreaming about bombing the hell out of Iraq for a decade, the only bulwark against Israeli geopolitical ambitions. Douglas Feith and Richard Perle wrote a paper about this for Netanyahu, entitled “”A Clean Break: A New Strategy for the Realm.” Now they’ve got exactly what they wanted: a destroyed Iraqi society full of depleted uranium-deformed babies.
Richard Perle. [Source: Public domain]
The Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies, an Israeli think tank, publishes a paper titled “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm.” [Washington Times, 10/7/2002; Chicago Sun-Times, 3/6/2003] The paper, whose lead author is neoconservative Richard Perle, is meant to advise the new, right-wing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Other authors include:
influential neoconservative academic and former Bush adviser Richard Perle, primarily responsible for the content of the paper;
Meyrav Wurmser, the future director of the neoconservative Hudson Institute’s Center for Middle East Policy;
her husband David Wurmser, the future chief adviser for Middle East policy for future vice-president Dick Cheney;
neoconservative Douglas Feith, who will be the prime architect of the Iraq war;
and a number of lesser-known neoconservatives, including James Colbert, Charles Fairbanks, Jr., Jeffrey T. Bergner, Jonathan Torop, and Robert Loewenberg.
Rebuilding Zionism by Abandoning Past Policies – It advocates making a complete break with past policies by adopting a strategy “based on an entirely new intellectual foundation, one that restores strategic initiative and provides the nation the room to engage every possible energy on rebuilding Zionism.…” [Guardian, 9/3/2002]