Oops Pedo Joe forgot one. Or is she some sort of behind the scenes kingpin they all hate and wanted to leave twisting in the wind? There is no doubt this is some sort of Eyes Wide Shut satanic club. Cassidy is f*cked because she has been directly called a liar by Secret Service agents who were in the presidential limo on J6 who say she is full of sh*t. As well as the person she attributes the hearsay testimony too, White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations Anthony Ornato.
Hutchinson is the one who said to the J6 Committee that Trump reached forward and grabbed for the steering wheel of the limo when the driver said he would not take him to the Capitol to calm down the rioters. Ridiculous on its face because that limo is huge inside and Trump does not have an arm that is six feet long.
We know Liz Cheney illegally destroyed the testimony transcripts, but we can always call them to the stand again.
This is open and shut. If Pam Bondi does not prosecute this unpardoned swamp creature for lying to Congress, then we know for sure she is Deep State too and part of the problem, like a lot of people are already saying since here we are three months in and still no one has been arrested or perp walked. Calls for her to resign will be justified. It would be an important case because it would send the message to not rest too comfortably if you are going to participate in a monstrous "insurrection" lie that ends up putting peacefully protesting Americans (most were) in jail. Five of them killed themselves.
“It’s also interesting, I think, to look at those he didn’t pardon,” [Congressman Barry Loudermilk] added, mentioning star Jan. 6 select committee witness Cassidy Hutchinson."
"Hutchinson, who at the time was an aide to former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, testified to the select committee that she was told Trump had shouted: “I’m the f—ing president! Take me up to the Capitol now!” before he tried to grab the steering wheel from the driver in a desperate effort to join his supporters marching towards the Capitol.
Loudermilk’s report notes that Hutchinson’s testimony was “directly refuted” by White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations Anthony Ornato – the man who according to Hutchinson, told her the anecdote – and the Secret Service agent driving the SUV.
“Ornato testified that the first time he had ever heard the story Hutchinson claims Ornato told her on January 6, was during Hutchinson’s public testimony,” the oversight subcommittee report states.
“Hutchinson’s testimony was also contradicted by the [Secret Service] agent who was with President Trump on January 6,” the subcommittee found, which notes that “Hutchinson’s accusation came up only after the Secret Service agent’s attorney proactively brought up the subject” to select committee investigators.
Hutchinson’s testimony was debunked by several witnesses, including the driver of the Secret Service SUV.
“The driver testified that he specifically refuted the version of events as recounted by Hutchinson,” according to the report. “The driver of the SUV testified that he ‘did not see him reach [redacted]. [President Trump] never grabbed the steering wheel. I didn’t see him, you know, lunge to try to get into the front seat at all.’”
The select committee “hid the driver’s full testimony and only favorably mentioned his testimony in its Final Report, it did not release the full transcript,” Loudermilk’s committee determined. "
“The testimony of … four White House employees directly contradicts claims made by Cassidy Hutchinson and by the select committee in the final report,” read the report by the House administration subcommittee on oversight, which searched for alleged bias or malpractice in the January 6 investigation.
“None of the White House employees corroborated Hutchinson’s sensational story about President Trump lunging for the steering wheel of the Beast,” the report said, referring to the colloquial name for cars that carry the president."
"I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September
attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid
telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider
the killing of innocent women, children, and other humans as an
appreciable act." - Bin Laden interview with Daily Ummat, Sept. 2001, posted in Lew Rockwell
"The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these
attacks within itself; the people who are a part of the U.S. system, but
are dissenting against it. Or those who are working for some other
system; persons who want to make the present century as a century of
conflict between Islam and Christianity." - Bin Laden interview with Daily Ummat, Sept. 2001, posted in Lew Rockwell
Now that the physical impossibility of multiple steel frame skyscrapers blowing themselves to pieces as the result of kerosene and fire-retardant office fires has been demonstrated, by many people including 3,000 Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a feeble last line of defense continues to be raised. Did or did not 19 hijackers board the 9/11 planes and fly them into the buildings? And if they did not fly them into the buildings (excluding WTC 7 which was not hit,) who did? Ignoring the fact that the question is irrelevant to the impossible physics of the official story, the answer is the same technology seen over the skies in Afghanistan and Pakistan hundreds of times every day. Aircraft of many sizes are routinely flown by remote operators located as much as thousands of miles away. The
technology of remote flying is very old. The pilots for missions by drones in Afghanistan are located mainly in Creech AFB, Nevada. This includes precision maneuvers such as take off and landing. Little known to most airline customers, the planes they are on are frequently being landed on autopilot, in all but the most hazardous of weather conditions. The precise flying skills which would be problematic for amateurs trained only in simulators would be relatively easy in the hands of professional remote operators with the assistance of GPS mapping and perhaps homing beacons placed in the targeted floors. USAF pilots at Creech AFB, Nevada flying remote missions of Predator Drones over Afghanistan: A US Air Force captain operates a Predator drone over Kandahar,
Afghanistan, from Creech Air Force Base in Indian Springs, Nev., Christian Science Monitor: Drone pilots: Why war is also hard for remote soldiers Monaghan in his paper "Plausibility Of 9/11 Aircraft Attacks Generated
By GPS-Guided Aircraft Autopilot Systems" describes the high level of
precision of modern autopilot systems,
which is a standard feature of almost all commercial aircraft. Most
commercial travelers, without knowing it, have been in a plane which was
landed on auto-pilot, "no hands." In fact, pilots are required to test the autoland system on commercial aircraft at least once a month. Monaghan, an Electrical Engineer, writes in
"Plausibility Of 9/11 Aircraft Attacks Generated By GPS-Guided Aircraft Autopilot Systems":
"The alleged flight performances of inexperienced terrorist pilots
accused of proficiently operating complex flight control systems of four
aircraft during the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 has
surprised observers. Moreover, official information presented to
demonstrate terrorist pilot control of the said aircraft has been either
unverifiable or demonstrated to contain noteworthy anomalies. The
flight paths of the September 11, 2001 attack aircraft bear
characteristics common to the capabilities provided by precision
automated flight control systems and related commercial aviation
technology that emerged just prior to these attacks. The clandestine use
of precise augmented GPS guided auto-pilot aircraft systems in order to
perform the said aircraft attacks is hypothesized. ... Aviation and popular publications describe a complex 2006 RNP test
flight performed by a Boeing 757 containing Flight Management Systems
(FMS) and augmented GPS signal receivers scheduled to be contained by
American and United airlines 757 and 767 aircraft during the late 1990s,
utilizing waypoint coordinate information contained within the
aircraft's Flight Management Computer (FMC), that included a descent
from a 38,000 foot altitude. Guided entirely by autopilot, an Air China Boeing 757 jet last month
snaked along a narrow river valley between towering Himalayan peaks ...
the airplane automatically followed the twists of the valley, descending
on a precisely plotted highway in the sky toward a runway still out of
sight ... Using global-positioning satellites and on-board instruments,
Naverus' navigation technology pinpoints the location of a fast-moving
jet to within yards ... "
The following is a photo of the largest unmanned aircraft that we
know of, the Global Hawk, which set a distance record when it flew in
one hop from the US to Australia:
But, as with many coincidences on 9/11, the story now gets even better. Pentagon Comptroller Dov Zakheim, Inventor of Remote Hijack Technology and Responsible for $2.3 Trillion Missing from Pentagon The following image is from the website for Flight Termination System (FTS), invented by Dov Zakheim, Comptroller of the Pentagon on Sept. 10, 2001 the day $2.3 trillion was announced missing. Zakheim's company SPC invented
FTS to enable the seizing of hijacked airliners from the ground. The
system had already been tested by 9/11 although Bush lied about this in a
speech.
The following is the HistoryCommons entry on the successful testing,
before 9/11, of technology allowing a commercial aircraft's controls to
be seized from the ground, described as an "anti-hijacking" system:
"A Raytheon 727 lands in New Mexico in August, 2001. [Source: Associated
Press] It is reported that the US company Raytheon landed a 727 six
times in a military base in New Mexico without any pilots on board. This
was done to test equipment making future hijackings more difficult, by
allowing ground control to take over the flying of a hijacked plane."
[Associated Press, 10/2/2001; Der Spiegel (Hamburg), 10/28/2001]
Motive, Means, and Opportunity in the Crime of 9/11 Instructions to jurors in a court of law require the prosecutor to
satisfy three elements: motive, means, and opportunity. Means would
include access to remote hijack technology, a subset of remote flying.
It is of interest that Dov Zakheim, directly responsible as comptroller
for the disappearance of $2.3 trillion from the Pentagon, not only had
access to remote hijack technology, but invented it. Zakheim's company,
SPC, also had, as a means, complete knowledge of the construction,
security plan, and lay-out of the World Trade Center towers, as
contractor for the official investigation of the first WTC bombing in 1993. The investigation was performed by Tridata, a full subsidiary of SPC. As a member of Project for a New American Century (PNAC), which advocated the
invasion of Iraq, even under Clinton, and expressed a need for a "new Pearl Harbor," motive
is also established for Zakheim as part of a cabal which would include Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, both also members of PNAC. The Department of Defense and its civilian bosses were responsible for
the nation's air defenses and the scheduling of war games. It is
well-known that war games resembling the real-life unfolding of 9/11
confused NORAD commanders, one of whom, Major Kevin Nasypany, said that morning: “The hijack’s not supposed to be for another hour.” Who else at the DoD possessed the motive and means to participate in the crime, and had the opportunity? Dr. Steve R. Pieczenik,
former Assistant Deputy Secretary of State under presidents Nixon,
Ford and Carter, fingers exactly the people who would be in a position
to schedule war games, and they all happen to be members of PNAC, which openly stated its desire to invade Saddam, even under Clinton.
In its key policy paper "Rebuilding America's Defenses" PNAC said:
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings
revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some
catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor" - PNAC, Rebuilding America's Defenses
Dr. Pieczenik says:
"It was called a stand-down and false flag operation in order to
mobilize the American public under the false pretense that we had been
attacked by Al Qaeda and bin Laden which is an absolute unmitigated lie.
I was even told by a general on the staff of Wolfowitz, I will
go in front of a federal committee and swear on perjury who that name
was so we can break this open...the great war and the great lie that
was created for us to make sure we had some kind of commitment to a war
that was not necessary in which so much blood and guts were shed for
unnecessary reasons." -Dr. Steve R. Pieczenik, (source interview here.) Veterans Today: "Top Insider Says Bin Laden Died in 2001"
Notably for the element of motive, hard-core Neocons Feith and Perle are also authors of a key paper written for Israeli PM Netanyahu in 1996 urging the invasion of Iraq, "A Clean Break: A New Strategy for the Realm"
The paper reinforces the long and clearly-stated Israeli foreign
policy goal of destroying Iraq and reducing it to squabbling
mini-states, so that plans for Israeli hegemony in the Middle East can
proceed apace. Feith and Perle are proteges of Israeli intellectual
Oded Yinon who wrote in as far back as 1982 in "A Strategy for Israel
for the 1980s":
"In Iraq, a division into provinces along ethnic/religious lines as
in Syria during Ottoman times is possible. So, three (or more) states
will exist around the three major cities: Basra, Baghdad and Mosul, and
Shi'ite areas in the south will separate from the Sunni and Kurdish
north." - Oded Yinon, in "A Strategy for Israel for the 1980s"
Finally of course, Vice President Dick Cheney famously failed to
issue a shoot-down order directed at Flight 77, described in the 9/11 Commission Report, pages 8-9, as Chairman Hamilton questioned US Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta who was with Cheney:
CHAIRMAN HAMILTON: I wanted to focus just a moment on the
Presidential Emergency Operating Center. You were there for a good part
of the day. I think you were there with the vice president. And when you
had that order given, I think it was by the president, that authorized
the shooting down of commercial aircraft that were suspected to be
controlled by terrorists, were you there when that order was given? MR. MINETA: No, I was not. I was made aware of it during the time that
the airplane coming into the Pentagon. There was a young man who had
come in and said to the vice president, "The plane is 50 miles out. The
plane is 30 miles out." And when it got down to, "The plane is 10 miles
out," the young man also said to the vice president, "Do the orders
still stand?" And the vice president turned and whipped his neck around
and said, "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to
the contrary?"
The simple incontrovertible fact that the standing order referred to by the officer was a stand-down order is the fact that Flight 77 did not get shot down, but was allowed to hit its target by Cheney. Dick Cheney also was a member of Project for a New American Century (membership list.) Cheney Chief of Staff Scooter Libby was also a member of PNAC. (PNAC associations with the Bush administration.) Nor was the desire by the PNAC Neoconservatives to invade Iraq merely
idle thinking. Even before 9/11, immediately upon being appointed to
seats at the helm of the nation's defenses by George W. Bush, Wolfowitz,
Rumsfeld, Perle, Feith, NSA Director Elliot Abrams, National Security
Advisor Stephen Hadley, Scooter Libby, and others became the prime
architects of the Iraq War. Even before the September attacks, they had
set to work planning the invasion which would kill 5,000 Americans, many
of whom rushed to enlist in response to 9/11. With IEDs the new weapon
of choice against American armor, many died rolling out of Humvees with
their bodies on fire. Hadley and Abrams are also named by Secretary
Piezcenik. Bush Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill told Ron Susskind
in "The Price of Loyalty" that the Bush administration began planning
the invasion of Iraq within days of taking office. O'Neill said:
"From the very first instance, it was about Iraq. It was about what
we can do to change this regime...Day one, these things were laid and
sealed...It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of
it. The president saying 'Go find me a way to do this,'
Documents
obtained after a court fight by the citizen's watchdog Judicial
Watch showed that Vice President Dick Cheney's Energy Task Force
had been studying Iraqi oil reserves at least since March 2001.
"The Iraq adventure was initiated by a small number of
neoconservative intellectuals and assertive nationalists, ultimately
backed by George W. Bush's gut. The numbers were small enough for
Powell's longtime assistant Lawrence Wilkerson to refer plausibly to a
"cabal" as being responsible for the war."
"...singles out former Bush aides David Wurmser, Douglas Feith,
Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz for their roles in fomenting the war
and though he says that talking about Israeli security as a motive is
the "third rail of American politics," he concludes that "sympathy for
Israel and its interests" played an important role in the war plans."
Many of the Bush Iraq War advocates have retired and are profiting handsomely from their connections to the war. Putting it Together: Scenario 404 Scenario 404 is one hypothetical scenario which brings together elements
of well-known and easily available technology to explain the high
levels of navigation and flying skills seen on 9/11, published here at 911Research:
"The use of AAL Flight 11 and UAL Flight 175 to attack the Twin
Towers, and of AAL Flight 77 to attack the Pentagon requires the
execution of two main tasks in each case: -Rendering unconscious the flight crew and passengers, preventing any communications from them about events in the cabin. -Taking over the flight computers, allowing the planes to be auto-piloted to their targets. Task 1 is achieved with aerosol bombs of decapacitating gas hidden in
luggage. The gas is fentanyl, the extremely potent opiate used by
Russian forces to end the hostage crisis in the theater in Chechnya. The
bombs detonate when the barometric trigger senses a cabin pressure
corresponding to an altitude of 28,000 feet. The fentanyl gas diffuses
throughout the cabin and is absorbed so rapidly by the victims that they
cannot even pick up a cell phone or handset to initiate a call. Task 2 is accomplished with an autopilot program in an upgrade package,
disguised as a high-altitude stall-recovery program. The
instrument-triggered program is started by the flight computer when the
plane passes through 30,000 feet and proceeds to fly the aircraft into
its target with down-to-the-meter accuracy. Pairs of operatives at Logan and Dulles airports posing as passengers
check the bomb-concealing luggage onto the targeted flights. Technicians in a control center in Building 7 track the three jetliners
and can communicate with the autopilot program through a data port. If
necessary they can modify the programmed course of the aircraft. On Flights 11, 175, and 77, a nearly identical sequence of events
transpires. First the decapacitating gas is dispersed, knocking out
everyone on board. Then, after about 5 minutes, as the plane continues
to climb, the Trojan horse program is activated and it proceeds to turn
the transponder off and begin maneuvering the plane toward its final
target. As Flight 77 swoops toward the Pentagon after a spectacular spiral dive,
the program switches its transponder on, this time with a code
identifying itself as a friendly F-16. Flying within 500 feet of the
ground for the last mile of its approach, and at a speed of over 500 mph
(three times as fast as jetliners normally fly so close to the ground)
makes it appear to be a much smaller plane from a distance, with nearby
witnesses being impressed by its size and sudden presence. Its friendly
transponder allows it to avoid triggering the missile batteries on the
lawn's perimeter. However, a specially-programmed surface-to air system,
located less than 100 feet from the Pentagon's facade, fires a missile
at the Flight 77 just as its nose begins to impact the facade. The
explosion of the warhead shatters the plane's tail section, preventing
the rudder from leaving an imprint on the facade. The speed of the crash
prevents the explosions from greatly altering the trajectory of the
plane's contents, which enter the building, mostly reduced to small
pieces."
Whether Scenario 404 is accurate or not, it is clear that ranking members of the Bush administration all meet the legal requirement for the proving of motive, means, and opportunity in the commission of any crime. The movement for 9/11 truth has painstakingly made its case in showing what could not have happened. The ground has shifted to reasonable speculation which proposes theories of what did.
Dr. Dahlia Wasfi, Jewish-Iraqi Activist
Dr. Alan Sabrosky, former Director of Studies at US Army War College,
General of the Army Douglas MacArthur Chair of Research. Concludes
that a combination of treasonous elements in the US government and
Israeli MOSSAD orchestrated 9/11, in order to enable invasion of Iraq.
NOTE: CLICK RED "YOUTUBE" BUTTON ON VIDEOS IF YOU ARE HAVING TROUBLE VIEWING
As public awareness grows about the truth about 9/11, it serves to point out that many features of the towers' destruction fit perfectly with standard patterns of demolition. Evidence which at first seems puzzling is in fact consistent with known demolition techniques.
WTC 7 differed from Towers One and Two in that WTC7 was a traditional "bottom-up" implosion. The Twin Towers, on the other hand, exhibited the more unfamiliar pattern of a "banana peel" demolition, which starts at the middle or the top of a building and progresses downward. The below demolition in China shows the pattern of streamers of arcing
debris that we see coming from the Twin Towers, as the cutting of
supports begins high above ground level and works its way down.
Banana Peel Demolition in China next to Twin Towers
Banana peel demolitions are used for taller, narrower buildings, where there is danger of the building tipping over should the bottom be cut and the rest of the sequence not execute perfectly. But first, just how does a demolition work? Students of the truth about 9/11 will not be surprised to learn that it is essentially the art and science of causing to happen what cannot happen without careful engineering: all structural supports in a building must be cut at essentially the same time, so that all pieces are falling at free-fall acceleration through thin air. It is a difficult undertaking to remove all supports nearly simultaneously in redundantly engineered modern high-rises, with extensive cross-bracing which transfers load from compromised members to sound ones. Even then, failed demolitions are not uncommon. In the below images we see the principle support columns in the "core" of WTC 1, an extensively cross-braced steel assembly which served as the backbone of the towers, and held 70% of the weight. Twin Tower core backbone under construction
Illustration of main support columns
One standard technique is the use of "cutter' and "kicker" charges, in which the first set of charges, the cutters, cut the steel beam supports at precisely timed intervals, and the kicker charge "kicks" the cut piece outward. In all the film evidence of the Towers' destruction, straight, cleanly cut pieces of steel beam can be seen spinning outward from the Towers at explosive speeds, across an area at least three times as long as the Towers are wide. Thirty foot, multi-ton pieces of steel beam and perimeter assembly were found nearly three football fields away from the nearest tower, and windows were blown out across the WTC. These startling facts cannot be overstated.
Cut Steel Being Hurled Laterally at Speeds up to 80 MPH
Photo: debris field width - See more at: http://busharchives.org/#sthash.CHejJbvU.dpuf
Width of Debris Field
Photo: debris field width - See more at: http://busharchives.org/#sthash.CHejJbvU.dpuf
Photo: debris field width - See more at: http://busharchives.org/#sthash.CHejJbvU.dpuf
Physicist David Chandler Narrates North Tower Demolition
Using this technique, the pattern of debris one would expect to see lying on the ground after the destruction would be cleanly-cut, straight steel pieces, rather than twisted, heat deformed pretzels of steel as implied by the official "steel got soft and buckled" story. Exactly as predicted, an aerial photo of the debris field shows a thick carpet of arrow-straight, cleanly-cut lengths of steel beam, flung hither and yon.
Aerial View, Steel Debris, from largest detail photo HERE.
Wider Aerial View, Steel Debris, from largest detail photo HERE.
Use of Thermite In its famous attack on skeptics of the official 9/11 story, Popular Mechanics held that the melting agent thermite had never been used in a demolition before. Ironically it had, on the Chicago Sky Ride in 1935. It was reported in Popular Mechanics. Thermite works by melting through steel like a hot knife through butter, illustrated in the video below.
Thermite vs. Car
Reaching temperatures of 5,000F, thermite can be expected to produce large pools of molten steel and iron. This is exactly what was found, to the puzzlement of rescue workers, in the basements of the Twin Towers. Relatively slow burning thermite would have been used to weaken strong points in the structures, such as mechanical floors, prior to demolition. So it is of interest that in WTC 2, molten steel seen dripping at around floors 80 and 81 corresponded somewhat, but not exactly, to the mechanical floors at floors 75-77, below.
WTC2 South Tower on 9/11 Molten Metal North-East Corner
In the following video demonstrating the use of thermite, the characteristic dripping of molten steel can be seen which exactly replicates, in color and consistency, that seen coming from the towers on a larger scale.
Thermite vs. Steel Plate
Another interesting use of thermite can be seen the moment just before each demolition when the perimeter columns around the impact areas seem to bow outward, giving the impression of overload. Thermite melting the core columns so that all load is transferred to the perimeter columns would give precisely this effect. Another spectacular coincidence is the "fireproofing upgrades" which took place a year before 9/11, but only on floors of or near impact in both Towers, floors 92 - 100 in WTC1, and 77 - 78 of WTC2, which required the vacating of tenants during the work (page 42, NIST NCSTAR1-6A.) Molten iron and steel was not observed dripping from the building until about ten minutes before destruction. This would be when firefighters were reporting that the fires were under control and almost out. One thing which stands out about the presence of molten steel in the basements is that it stayed molten for so long, reported for weeks and even months afterwards. This would require a powerful exothermic reaction, hot enough not just to melt steel, but to raise its temperature considerably above melting point in order for heat to be stored, in the same way that water brought to near boiling cools down into the solid state of ice far more slowly than water at room temperature. With the melting point of steel at 2800F, and the thermite reaction reaching temperatures of 5,000F, the reaction would produce enough heat-energy to keep steel molten - i.e. in liquid state - for long periods of time. Thus the evidence again fits what we would expect to find in a demolition that was a combination of thermite, and cutter and kicker charges. On 9/11, cutter charges would simply have been much bigger versions of the steel beam cutter charge (linear shape charge) demonstrated in the video below:
Linear Shape Charges
A video simulation of the Towers' inner structure posted at Youtube includes an illustration of a cutter-kicker sequence.
Demolitions Expert Tom Sullivan A demolitions expert formerly with Controlled Demolitions Inc. (CDI,) which was contracted to help with the clean-up phase at Ground Zero, said in an interview:
"Fire cannot bring down steel-framed high rises — period."
"that he knew from the first day that the destruction of
World Trade Center Building 7 on 9/11 was a classic controlled
implosion. Asked how he thought it might have been done he posited,
“looking at the building it wouldn’t be a problem — once you gain access
to the elevator shafts…then a team of expert loaders would have hidden
access to the core columns and beams. The rest can be accomplished with
just the right kind of explosives for the job. Thermite can be used as
well.”
Sullivan said:
"I mean, come on, it was complete destruction. I've seen buildings fall
like that for years -- that was the end game for me."
The means of igniting and controlling the demolition suggested by Sullivan, interestingly, coincides with the one proposed in an early hypothetical blasting scenario by Jim Hoffman, an artificial intelligence engineer. In the section "Control Architecture" of the scenario Hoffman posits:
Ignition of the incendiaries
and detonation of the explosives
is controlled through a wireless network
using RF repeaters on every floor of the Towers having pyrotechnics. Each of the Stage-2 pyrotechnics units
-- the kicker charges and explosive sheets --
has an integrated wireless detonator card
that includes a 2-channel RF receiver, an accelerometer,
logic, dual wafer batteries, and a micro-detonator... The detonator cards are programmed to respond only to RF signals
on the network's broadcast frequencies that have specific codes.
The cards are manufactured in batches of cards with identical codes,
where each batch has a unique code and is destined for a specific floor
of one of the Towers. Of a detonator card's two channels,
one provides the arm signal,
and the other provides a detonation signal.
Once the arm signal has been received,
the detonator will be triggered by either of two events:
rapid acceleration detected by the accelerometer,
or receipt of the detonation signal.
Below is an image of this kind of system currently on the market for CD companies, published at ae911truth.org (Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.)
Conclusion Once 24/7 access to the towers' interiors and the rest of the WTC complex has been established, the planned destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7 becomes a task for which all technology is well-developed and available. Access is established through Marvin Bush, the youngest Bush brother, who was on the board of Securacom, the company which held the security contract for the World Trade Center complex. According to Barry McDaniel, CEO of Securacom, the company held the contract for security
“up to the day the buildings fell down.” The nexus which seems to connect many of key players in the 9/11 plot is the neoconservative think-tank Project for a New American Century (PNAC.) PNAC, whose members included Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Jeb Bush, Elliot Abrams, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, Zalmay Khalilzad, Scooter Libby, and Richard Armitage, had been openly advocating for an invasion of Iraq since the Clinton administration. Dov Zakheim, another member of PNAC, had been awarded the contract for the first WTC bombing investigation in 1993. The investigation was done by a fully-owned subsidiary of Zakheim's company SPC, Tridata. The contract assured that not only access to the towers was secured, but also floor plans, blueprints, and all other intimate technical knowledge of the buildings. Zakeim, who was appointed Comptroller of the Pentagon by Bush upon taking office, was also in charge of the Pentagon's finances at the time $2.3 trillion was announced missing from the Pentagon, on September 10 the day before 9/11. Needless to say, after 9/11 "the day the world changed," the story was dropped from the media. In another coincidence involving Zakheim, his company SPC (of which he was CEO and main shareholder) also invented remote 'anti-hijack" technology, by which an airliner's controls could be seized from the ground to foil hijackers. This technology has obvious ramifications for misuse in the wrong hands. In a city like New York, the world's most dynamic metropolis, the "city that never sleeps," extra work crews, maintenance crews, technicians, and delivery trucks working round-the-clock would not be noticed. Nevertheless, some people did notice certain unusual events, such as a series of "power downs" and a generally unusual amount of activity in the months before 9/11. In the below video a worker describes a "power down" condition days before 9/11, which would have disabled security cameras and alarms.
Worker Describes "Power Down" Days Before 9/11
One favorite contention of defenders of the official story is that the aircraft impacts would have set-off or destroyed explosive charges. But the loss of a number of charges would be of no consequence in a redundantly "wired" impact zone, since only specific encoded signals could actually arm and trigger the entire detonation sequence. As Air Force Col. Bob Bowman once said: "If they have nothing to hide, why are they hiding everything?" The immediate, illegal destruction of 99.5% of the steel evidence, shipped to and melted in China, ensures that the vast majority of the steel can never be examined and tested to either confirm or disprove the presence of the above demolition techniques. This alone, said Bowman, is evidence of guilt. Some kinds of thermite can be applied in a "sol-gel" solution, which can be rolled on like paint, or fireproofing. Think how inconvenient, then, to have steel beams examined and found to have layers of residual thermite paint. It is no wonder that putting the steel onto ships bound for China, immediately, was of the utmost importance, even if it represented felony destruction of evidence. In the end the testimony of firefighters and other responders, like Firefighter John Schroeder below, stands as the most powerful indicator of what happened that day. Schroeder, who says he does not believe the official story, and who was on the 24th floor of the North Tower, reports explosions rocking the building from the inside, as it seemed to "disintegrate" from the core and the stairwells. This is precisely the part of the structure which would be most critical to weaken before a final demolition sequence.
Firefighter John Schroeder
There is no shortage of testimony corroborating Schroeder's description of explosions throughout the morning, which might correspond to the preliminary weakening of the buildings' strong points. Not one of these reports of explosions was included in the official 9/11 Commission report. One such explosion is captured on video below.
The audio evidence includes footage of what is clearly an accelerating demolition sequence, below.
Explosive Sequence, South Tower
Finally, there is the plethora of other puzzles beyond the scope of this essay, the scheduling of multiple war-games on the fateful day which sent much of the air defense force outside the nation's borders, the fantastic sudden flying skills of incompetent pilots, and of course the impossibility of the official explanation relying on a notion of mass accelerating in proportion to its increasing weight, which is a physics chimera (all mass of any weight accelerates to the ground at the same rate, and can only go slower as it meets resistance, not faster, as it was shown by Galileo.)
It is important to know that jet fuel is only kerosene, with no hotter burning temperature in open air than store-bought kerosene or barbecue lighter fluid. With most of the fuel blown out in the impact fireballs anyway, it is patently impossible for mere kerosene and office furniture to have burned any differently from standard office fires, at temperatures of rarely more than 800F before flashover.
It is also important to understand the impact of the planes could have caused no appreciable weakening of the lower three-quarters of the structures below the impact zones. Essentially hollow aluminum tubes except for the engines and landing gear, the planes were mostly shredded on impact with the steel latticework, as shown below. Moreover, the towers were designed to specifically withstand even multiple impacts of jumbo jetliners.
By "James Madison" In a remarkable and unprecedented phenomenon of engineering history, we are told that on 9/11 of 2001 the Twin Towers and Building 7 went down at the same speed as a replica made of giant Jenga blocks would have gone down. A Jenga block structure has no solid joints, no millions of diagonal cross-braces bolted or welded into place onto 47 five-foot-wide vertical support columns and cross-beams with enough steel for an aircraft carrier. Jenga blocks have nothing but air between the pieces. For this reason when a Jenga structure falls down, it falls to the ground in mere seconds, with the pieces falling at the speed of rocks falling from the sky, which is called free-fall acceleration. Mathematical proof that the official narrative is impossible is described below. But first it is helpful to understand in an intuitive way how the official explanation of the three collapses is impossible. The official NIST report, entitled "Final Report on the Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers" states on page 146:
"Since the stories below the level of collapse initiation provided little resistance to the tremendous energy released by the falling building mass, the building section above came down essentially in free fall, as seen in videos. As the stories below sequentially failed, the falling mass increased, further increasing the demand on the floors below, which were unable to arrest the moving mass."
This in essence is the progressive collapse theory of the Twin Towers, that there was "little resistance" to the collapse of upper floors, and so the towers behaved exactly as a house of cards or a Jenga skyscraper would behave at having their delicate equilibrium upset. The problem with the theory it is absurd. Defenders of the official theory are fond of recalling that it was also believed that the Titanic could never sink. But the Titanic when it sank violated no laws of physics. The Trade Center theory violates many. Free fall acceleration is the speed at which any object falls through thin air to the ground. It is 10 meters per second, per second. That means that for every second an object is falling, it is going another 10 meters per second faster. It is accelerating. So a baseball falling for 3 seconds attains the speed of 30 meters per second. Three seconds later it would be going 60 meters per second, and so forth. Building 7 exactly resembled a bottom-up implosion, as if charges were cutting the structure from the bottom up, at an accelerating rate which would allow for the free fall of the upper floors. The Towers were of a very strong construction, having won awards for their novel and ingenious design. Frank DeMartini, and architect and the on-site construction manager for the WTC, said in January of 2001:
“The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it. That was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door—this intense grid—and the jet plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting.”
By "screen netting" DeMartini was referring to the extensive inter-connectivity of the structural members, which efficiently transferred load to surviving beams were some of the beams to be damaged or destroyed, just as cross-bracing is intended to do. So confident was DeMartini that the buildings would never collapse that he stayed in the South Tower and lost his life saving at least 50 people. Even Donald Trump, a builder who would in this field know what he's talking about, called the Towers two of the strongest buildings in the world. Below is a photo of one of the towers under construction. Note the multiple heavy sky cranes which are easily supported by the corners of the structure.
One problem with the official theory is that it relies on the flawed idea that as mass accumulates, it goes faster. But objects which are heavier do not fall faster than objects that are lighter, the unspoken premise of the official story. In a vacuum, even a feather and a bowling ball would fall at the same speed. An object can only go slower than the rate of free fall acceleration, as it meets resistance. This goes back to Galileo. So steel frames offering massive resistance, fires or no fires, cannot fall as fast as Jenga blocks. The reason is simple. Because they are not Jenga blocks.
Think of it another way.Look at the picture below. Which block reaches the ground first? Because on 9/11, they both reached the ground at virtually the same time. But given the difference in the mediums they are falling through, air versus the path of greatest resistance through construction grade steel, the one on the right should reach the ground first, because there is nothing between it and the ground. On 9/11, the impossible happened and they both reached the ground at the same time.
Recall that bottom three-fourths of the towers were undamaged and intact, and we can hear firefighters reporting from inside that the fires they found were small and isolated. Seven minutes before the first collapse, battalion chief Orio Palmer can be heard saying from the 78th floor of the South Tower:
"Ladder 15, we've got two isolated pockets of fire. We should be able to knock it down with two lines [hoses]."
Another witness in the South Tower said he saw only "flames licking the wall" and that there was "no raging inferno" on 78th floor, one of the impact floors. This stands to reason. Jet fuel is only kerosene. It burns no hotter or longer, in fact in cold temperatures it can be fairly hard to light. And most of it blew out in the fireballs. Even when skyscrapers have burned like raging infernos from top to bottom, for 20 hours, they still didn't come close to collapsing. That is because the forge-like temperatures required to bring large quantities of steel to the point of catastrophic failure cannot be achieved without a mechanically forced air supply, like in a blast furnace. This would correspond to the steel approaching red hot. The black smoke emanating from the Twin Tower fires indicate cool, oxygen-starved fires going out. All tower office furniture and combustibles met strict fire retardant code specifications.
Below: Windsor Hotel fire, burned 20 hours, steel and concrete construction. Didn't collapse. Twin Towers were 100% steel frame construction much stronger. Source: 9-11 Research: The Windsor Building Fire
Twin Towers Fires
Below: Aftermath of Windsor fire.
Putting the block illustration above more scientifically, if the 15 story section is falling at free fall speed, all of its gravitational potential energy is converted to kinetic energy (movement). It is not available to do the work of "crushing" the building below. It would have to slow down in order to do any other work, i.e., "crushing" 80,000 tons of structural steel below, and that work quantity would have to be subtracted from kinetic energy, which is speed. Kinetic energy, and acceleration, can only decrease as resistance is overcome. It cannot increase. Jenga blocks fall as they do because the no kinetic energy is expended to do the work of breaking connections, thus slowing the falling mass. The amount of work-energy which must be subtracted from kinetic energy is zero. These are the irons laws of Newtonian physics. To illustrate what happens when a falling mass meets resistance, one only need think back to the old Prell Shampoo commercial of a pearl falling through shampoo. The pearl sinks slowly through the viscous medium, many times more viscous than air. Steel is thousands of times more resistant, even at high temperatures, yet we are to believe that a mass would have crushed it at the same speed it would fall through air.
Object falling through medium denser than air
The official theory blithely dismisses the massive resistance of a steel frame which would prevent the upper stories from achieving the free fall acceleration of 10 meters per second, per second. If resistance were not countering potential energy, all buildings should fall around our ears this moment, or tip like Jenga blocks at the slightest touch. They do not fall around our ears because, unlike Jenga blocks or dominoes, resistance to the force of gravity is bolted and welded in throughout the building's structural members, including extensive cross-bracing and 3-inch thick steel gusset plates, placing the potential energy of the tower in static equilibrium. Jenga, dominoes, and playing cards have zero resistance between their structural members, which is why they fall when a delicate equilibrium is even slightly upset. From every direction, including laterally in the event of 200 mph hurricane winds, at maximum load, the Towers were designed to keep standing, as safety factors in high-rise construction are usually 5 - 6 times maximum load in any conceivable circumstances including earthquakes. As for the damage from planes and fuel, jetliners are basically hollow, light aluminum tubes, no match for steel. Watch how easily this steel crane demolishes a scrapped jetliner below.
Below is sliced up wreckage from one of the 9/11 airliners. Then of course there is Building 7, never even hit by a plane but collapsing just as fast as the towers. In physics, the idea of resistance to free fall acceleration, in following case the resistance of air, which slows the speed of a mass, is expressed in the "drag coefficient" of the equation for terminal velocity, below. This becomes significant only when an object is dropped from a great height like from an airplane. Where:
When a drag coefficient is very high, a falling mass reaches terminal velocity very soon, and does not accelerate anymore. When a drag coefficient is extremely high, terminal velocity will be zero, and the falling mass will stop. A steel frame is an example of a state of matter which would have an extremely high drag coefficient. If this sounds like an understatement, it should, and one which renders the idea of "progressive collapse" like Jenga blocks ridiculous.
In the above equation, the drag coefficient is in the denominator of a square root. Therefore the bigger the drag coefficient, the lower the velocity.
Wrap your mind around the law of physics proven by Galileo, and you will see that the collapsing mass could not have gone faster as the mass got heavier. Only slower as the mass met resistance, and lots of it. Therefore the official explanation for how the towers disappeared so quickly is false. There is no possible collapse mechanism except pre-placed demolition charges and incendiary devices. Proof that all objects of different weights fall to the ground at the same speed;
[/CENTER]" width="640" />
