Confirmation That the "Dancing Israelis" on 9/11 Were Mossad, and Knew it Would Happen

First of all it is important to distinguish "proof" from "evidence." Even in a court of law someone is never "proven" guilty, but "found guilty beyond the shadow of a reasonable doubt."  The confirmation contained here derives from major media sources and FBI reports obtained through Freedom of Information Act requests.

The Israelis caught driving around NYC in vans showing traces of explosives, who were seen high-fiving each other as the towers burned, were confirmed to be Mossad agents who had prior knowledge that the towers were going to be hit, before they were hit.

Overview:
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHART...eisraelis.html

The New York Times reported Thursday that a group of five men had set up video cameras aimed at the Twin Towers prior to the attack on Tuesday, and were seen congratulating one another afterwards...They were seen by New Jersey residents on Sept. 11 making fun of the World Trade Center ruins and going to extreme lengths to photograph themselves in front of the wreckage. Witnesses saw them jumping for joy in Liberty State Park after the initial impact (5). Later on, other witnesses saw them celebrating on a roof in Weehawken, and still more witnesses later saw them celebrating with high fives in a Jersey City parking lot.

The respected NYC daily the Jewish Forward and other sources reported:

The FBI will later conclude at least two of the five are Mossad agents and that all were on a Mossad surveillance mission.

ABC News said:

ABC News has learned that after the five men were taken to jail, the entire case was transferred out of FBI's criminal division and into its foreign counterintelligence section, which is responsible for espionage cases. One reason for the shift, according to our sources, is that the FBI believed Urban Moving may have provided a cover for agents of Israeli intelligence.

My opinion: if two were Mossad, they were all Mossad.

Image from "9/11 And the Cover Up: Was Israel Involved in 9/11 Attack? (War by Deception)," By Ryan Dawson



Here are the two, the Kurzberg brothers in the studio audience of the Israeli talk show where one of them said "We were there to document the event." How did they know there was going to be an "event?'




In fact, we know they had prior knowledge that thousands of people were about to be slaughtered, because they had set up a camera on the towers, from Liberty Park, PRIOR to the first plane hit.

Fox News:

The New York Times reported Thursday that a group of five men had set up video cameras aimed at the Twin Towers prior to the attack on Tuesday, and were seen congratulating one another afterwards...

In fact, FBI reports obtained by Freedom of Information Act request show that the men were at the Doric Tower apartments, overlooking Liberty State Park, on the day BEFORE the attacks, scouting out the position. Here is a page from the FBI documents stating that the suspects were seen "in the Doric Towers on the afternoon prior to September 11, 2001" :



Full FBI report on "dancing Israelis" from Chris Bollyn's site:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/62392807/d...ction-1-944861


Evidence of explosives from FBI report:

 

The Mossad agents were eventually ordered released by Michael Chertoff, head of the FBI's criminal division. Chertoff became the first director of DHS. They were deported back to Israel.

What was Mossad doing in NYC in vans full of explosives, and how did they know the towers would be hit? If they knew, why didn't they tell anyone? A warning coming from Mossad would have been taken seriously and the towers evacuated and searched. Why were they flicking cigarette lighters and giving each others high fives as the towers burned?


Dr. Alan Sabrosky's answer: because this sealed the invasion of Iraq, and Iraq was a big problem for Israel.


Police scanner audio of arrests of Mossad agents:

9/11 and the Cover Up: Was Israel Involved? - Ryan Dawson

HistoryCommons Review:
http://www.historycommons.org/contex...01fiveisraelis

3:56 p.m. September 11, 2001: Five Apparent Israeli Spies Arrested for Puzzling Behavior at Time of First WTC Attack



The white van used by five Israeli agents as they were leaving New York on 9/11.Five Israelis are arrested for “puzzling behavior” related to the WTC attacks. Shortly after an FBI lookout bulletin was issued for a van with the words “Urban Moving Systems” written on the side, officers with the East Rutherford Police Department in New Jersey stop the van after matching the license plate number with the one given in the bulletin. According to the police report, Officer Scott DeCarlo and Sgt. Dennis Rivelli approach the van and demand the driver exit the vehicle. The driver, Sivan Kurzberg, does not obey after being asked several more times, so the police physically remove Kurzberg and four other men from the van and handcuff them. They have not been told the reasons for their arrest, but Kurzberg tells them, “We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem.” Again before the police have made any mention of the 9/11 attacks, another one of the arrested men says, “[W]e were on the West Side Highway in New York City during the incident.” In fact, it will later be determined they were on the roof of a building at Liberty State Park, watching and videotaping the first crash into the WTC (see Shortly After 8:46 a.m. September 11, 2001). [Bergen Record, 9/12/2001; Ha'aretz, 9/17/2001; CounterPunch, 2/7/2007]

The FBI and additional police quickly arrive. They shut down the section of Route 3 in East Rutherford where the van was stopped and evacuate a nearby hotel as a security precaution. [Bergen Record, 9/12/2001] One man is found with $4,700 in cash hidden in his sock, another has two foreign passports on him, and a box cutter is found in the van. [ABC News, 6/21/2002] Another has pictures of the men standing with the burning wreckage of the WTC in the background. [Forward, 3/15/2002]

All five identify themselves as Israeli citizens and claim to be working for the New Jersey-based Urban Moving Systems company. In addition to the driver Sivan Kurzberg, the others are identified as Paul Kurzberg (Sivan’s brother), Oded Ellner, Omer Marmari, and Yaron Shmuel. The men are detained but not charged. [Forward, 3/15/2002; ABC News, 6/21/2002]

The next day it will be reported that “bomb-sniffing dogs reacted as if they had detected explosives.” An investigator high up in the Bergen County law enforcement hierarchy will say in 2006, “There are maps of the city in the car with certain places highlighted…. It looked like they’re hooked in with this [referring to the 9/11 attacks]. It looked like they knew what was going to happen.…It looked like they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park.” [Bergen Record, 9/12/2001] The FBI will later conclude at least two of the five are Mossad agents and that all were on a Mossad surveillance mission. The FBI interrogates them for weeks. [Forward, 3/15/2002] They are held on immigration violation charges, but will be released 71 days later (see November 20, 2001). [ABC News, 6/21/2002]

Dr. Alan Sabrosky, former Director of Studies at US Army War College, General of the Army Douglas MacArthur Chair of Research. Concludes that a combination of treasonous elements in the US government and Israeli MOSSAD orchestrated 9/11, in order to enable invasion of Iraq.

Veterans Hold the Key to 9/11 Truth-Justice

A sample from a high-traffic, middle-of-the-road political forum board, where the hearts and minds are to be won for 9/11 truth-justice movement:

Originally Posted by Bushmaster LMAO! You can "knowlege" from now until the end of time, but the official story will always remain the same. Lol get it? Without application your "knowlege" is worthless. Just like those schmoes who used to do cyber-sex... Without an actual woman they weren't actually having sex, right? Truth movement = same same. And 100 years from now the history books will reflect that.

Official Story: 12 (years) Truth Movement: 0

In other words, even the disinformation artists (we have all run across them) concede that the rational debate over 9/11 truth has been won, by the truth movement, but the people are impotent in the face of enormous evil, and no action will ever be taken. Gloating that the cold-blooded murder of 3,000 Americans will never be avenged, even if what the Truth Movement says is true.

But is this true? Does diabolical evil always triumph over good?

Many regimes have held a far tighter iron grip on their country, and have fallen to rock bottom. During his 40 years in power, if you said Mubarak committed false flags to manipulate the Egyptian people, they would drag you away and pull out your fingernails. Fortunately, America has not yet come to this pass. In America the problem is not so much people not having their freedoms as much as people not using them, although this is gradually changing. Extraordinary rendition for American citizens, upheld by Obama, would put Americans outside the protection of all law, up to and including the threat of being murdered with impunity.

However, one man, a former Director of Studies at US Army War College, sees a road map to prosecution. Dr. Alan Sabrosky, former Marine, says that one constituency has the requisite lobbying power to force action. It is the veterans of the United States Armed Forces.

Sabrosky says the call will not come from the national command of the national veterans organizations, but from the local chapters. The local chapters are more independent and less involved in Washington politics than the national leaderships. Moreover, the call will be broadcast not by the national news organizations, but by their local affiliates, which similarly have different agendas than their national office.

Sabrosky says it is in the power of the local veterans to shake up the logjam which prevents 9/11 Truth from becoming into 9/11 Justice, and to change the political landscape forever. It is inevitably politically unpopular for a congressman to turn a deaf ear to veterans who have served their country, and fought in its wars.

But what to call for, exactly?

Calling for a true investigation has its merits, but can elicit its own feeling of hopelessness. What is to guarantee that a new commission will not be as compromised as the old one? Who will chose what members sit on it? There is a feeling among some 9/11 truth advocates that the public is all “commissioned out.”

But tell the Awake that you are working for a prosecution, and that might get ten minutes of his or her time. Don't tell me you're going to start another commission. We know what happens with those. Those &^%$ belong in jail, period.

Fortunately (but unfortunately for some,) there is a trail of evidence which leads to one participant, to an open-and-shut case. No great crime can succeed without destruction of the evidence, and on 9/11, this task fell to former Mayor of New York Rudy Giuliani.

Contracts were signed, all under the authority of the Mayor of New York, and they are pieces of paper in black and white.

Rudy was a bag man, a low level henchman. But that is where you always start when bringing down a cabal, and that is all we are talking about. Rudy can easily be threatened with 10 years of jail time for felony destruction of evidence in a capital crime. Rudy could chose to do his time quietly, or say who gave him the order to do this, in return for easy time or a grant of immunity. Any prosecutor who has one constituent who was harmed by the crime of 9/11 can bring the case, under the “effects” doctrine of the law.

Best of all, one need not be a 9/11 Truther to find merit in the case. At the very least, this was the unprecedented collapse of three steel-framed high-rises, due to fires, never seen before or since. If only for the lost chance to learn how to make buildings safer, the destruction of 99.5% of the steel evidence was a crime.

Merely bringing the case has multiple benefits. If one falls on the side of 9/11 Truth-Justice, it serves as a warning to future bag men that there will be a price to pay, therefore making the planning of false flag attacks more difficult. That makes us safer. No one wants to be the one to go to jail, where one's lifespan would likely be somewhat shortened. If one is merely interested in making the job safer for our brave firefighters, it would serve warning that such forensic evidence is not to be destroyed.

If Rudy decides not to do his time nicely, all bets are off. All senior ranking members of the Bush administration, including Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Dov Zakheim, and Douglas Feith, would need to be immediately ordered not to leave the country. For the time being.

It's a win-win, and then win some more. What say ye veterans?

James Madison writes under this pseudonym, in the tradition of the American Revolution's Publius, in order that arguments must be judged solely on the merits. He is a graduate of an Ivy League college and a well-known writer.

Why did FBI tip-off Boston suspects, resulting in Collier's death? FBI killed Collier

One thing we know for sure: the FBI knew exactly who the suspects in the surveillance photos were, days before it appealed to the public for help in identifying them. They had been investigating them for the last 2 years. So why did they play dumb and appeal to the public for help in identifying the two men in the surveillance photos, which caused them to flee and embark on the rampage which, according to the FBI, resulted in the death of MIT officer Sean Collier?

The minute those photos came out, every man in the Boston counter-terrorism unit should have said "That's Tamerlan Tsarnaev and his little brother." The Boston counter-terrorism unit had placed Tamerlan on at least one terrorism watch list, had interviewed him in their offices, and investigated his family. It kept getting warnings about him from Russian intelligence, as late as Oct. 2012. Yet on Thursday April 18 at around 5pm, Boston Special Agent Richard Deslauriers, head of the Boston division, held a press conference to release the surveillance photos and said:

"the public will play a critical role in identifying and locating them. Somebody out there knows these individuals as friends, neighbors, co-workers, or family members of the suspects."

Moreover, the M.O. of using pressure cooker bombs, spaced seconds apart, had Chechnya written all over it.   Paul J. Murray, a US counterterrorism expert and author of "Allah’s Angels: Chechen Women in War," told USNI News:

“The same scenario occurs frequently in the North Caucasus, using a single bomb, often in a trash can, then when emergency services arrive, a second bomb goes off, sometimes a third one.”

The rest is history. They knew who the suspects were, and knew where they lived (Tamerlan at 190 Norfolk St. in Cambridge.) They could have surrounded the house and captured or killed them before they panicked and went on the rampage that allegedly killed Collier. Someone tell me how the FBI is not responsible for Collier's death, if in fact the brothers killed him.

Note: the Boston FBI has a history of tipping off notorious criminals who it happens to be working with, like Whitey Bulger.

Surveillance photo released by FBI on Thursday April 18

http://www.fbi.gov/news/updates-on-i...-boston/photos


MIT police officer Sean Collier

Now is the Time for 9/11 Truth to Step in with a Specific Demand

IRS/AP/Benghazi: NWO appears off balance, as it looks like it is preparing to sacrifice a key asset, Obama. Good questions are being asked, like misuse of federal power. You don't want the people thinking about this too much.

It will be hard to replace so perfect a cipher, a blank slate advancing an agenda. The first Black president and therefore untouchable to liberals. But is he?

No one could have moved the ball forward on NDAA, assassination of American citizens, drones over US skies, and the Lockdown State better than Obama did, and with nary a peep from the cryptofascists at DailyKos, which even banned Gold Star mom Cindy Sheehan for criticizing Obama's war policies. So thin is the tolerance for dissent among his DNC hack and welfare mother support base that a mother who lost her son in Iraq cannot have her say.

Obama did it with a smile and gave you a warm fuzzy feeling that he was still your best friend.

Whatever the cause of the open battle within NWO, now is the time to step in. With the media actually doing some real reporting on the abuses by Obama that the well-informed have known all along - the intrusions into the Fourth Amendment, the ruthless calculation, the bloody murder - people are paying attention and thinking they may have power after all. It is a dangerous concept to put out there, which is why this changing horses in the middle of the river is tricky. You want to make it look like things are spinning out of control to provide drama. But you don't want things to start taking on lives of their own, and, well, really getting out of control.

The Boston Marathon backfired in a number of ways. No one went into fear mode after the attempted "lockdown" practice, as people in Boston and Cambridge walked the streets with their kids. The population is waking up to the idea of false flags. The Marathon is beloved. One of the first questions to pop up in a press conference with Governor Duval Patrick, by an Alex Jones reporter, was if the Marathon bombing was a false flag attack. The wonder is not that the question was asked. Nor even that it was actually aired by the media. The wonder is that no one had to ask what a "false flag" was.

Worse, the FBI left a bright, blood-red trail of incompetence at best, and most likely complicity. The M.O. is becoming familiar: lead patsies to an entrapment or step aside while the competent ones do their own thing, then act surprised when the drill goes live and call for more police powers.

Yeah, we've seen this one before. WTC 1993, Underwear Bomber, maybe the hijackers in 9/11.

More intriguing: That the big plan is to stage a crisis of great proportions for Obama by uncorking multiple scandals, as a steam valve for popular discontent with the economy. In this case, having one too many than they planned, a Mueller crisis, might have unintended consequences. The Mueller crisis lays rose petals right to the doorstep of a false flag on Obama's watch, which there is no denying and no re-spinning. Either Mueller could have stopped the Boston Marathon bombing or or he couldn't have. Unless the entire FBI is deaf, dumb, and blind, Mueller had to know. Anyone brought to the attention of the FBI by Russian intelligence would have the attention of the director himself.

World Trade Center 1993 is explained as an entrapment gone wrong by the New York Times, and by CBS News. The informant says that somehow the FBI "messed up" and real explosives were in place of the fake in the WTC garage. But everyone knows things don't just "mess up," and fairies don't replace fake powder with real in the middle of the night.

What a terrific time for the 9/11 Truth Movement to re-galvanize with a single clear demand!

What are the choices? As I see it, they are:

- Call for a new investigation, the most commonly heard demand. But we know investigative commissions are easily compromised. The past ten years of citizen investigation has built a scientific basis of evidence better than any that would come out of a commission. Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth's "Experts Speak Out" film provides a stellar witness list.

- Keep doing what we are doing: spreading information and awareness. But with maybe half the population now Truther, the danger is of lost momentum and opportunity. The natives are restless, and we can hear the war drums from miles away. NWO may sense the discontent and, through clumsy false flags and political shows, is trying to re-assert control. We knew that NWO in its death throes would be a dangerous beast. It's bleeding out slowly, but that tail is still a doozy. Sandy Hook and Boston show how vicious the dying lash-outs can be. Transparently pre-formed agendas such as gun control and self-lockdown betrayed desperation to finalize the police state taking shape since 9/11, in anticipation of the coming economic chaos, in which the 1% can crackdown and finally rid itself of those not willing to accept perpetual debt poverty as the new normal.

- Go for the jugular, calling for a prosecution. The public is ready if the politicians aren't. While NWO battles over some new pecking order and allows its discord to spill into the open, is the time to hit, and hit hard.
Former New mayor Rudy Giuliani is still plenty young and represents the first step. He is lowest on the totem pole as the bag man who destroyed the steel evidence. We have the contracts for the trucking to the docks and the deepening of Pier Six. For felony destruction of evidence at a crime scene, Rudy can be threatened with ten years at least. Under the law, any county prosecutor or state's attorney can convene a grand jury and ask for an indictment, based on "extended harm" doctrine.

A call for prosecution properly indicates that the Truth Movement has won the debate and now means business. Even a mere call for prosecution makes the perps a little bit smaller, a little less untouchable. Even a call for the prosecution of Giuliani which goes nowhere will serve a greater public good, since it puts the bag men who destroy the evidence on notice. We will go after them, and no false flag can be successful without bag men to destroy evidence.

A coordinated call for the prosecution of Giuliani will score a tangible victory for 9/11, by making future generations safer.  By striking at the soft underside of the cabal, the bag men who destroy the evidence, good bag men will be that much harder to find.

But this is a brick wall, you say, no prosecutor will ever answer the call, so no prosecution will ever take place.  But a former Director of Studies at US Army War College says there is a way.  Dr. Alan Sabrosky, you may recall, is of the opinion that a combination of treasonous elements in the US government and Israeli MOSSAD orchestrated 9/11, in order to enable invasion of Iraq, a long-held Israeli Neoconservative goal.  Former Director Sabrosky says that local US military veterans posts are the key to pushing for action on 9/11, and that as a powerful lobby, politicians will find it hard to dismiss them, and local media are likely to report cover them.

Countless times I have argued friends and colleagues to a reluctant draw, where they might even agree that the official 9/11 story is fishy, and likely a false flag. Then comes "what are you going to DO? Those kind of people never pay!" Sometimes there is anger, and perhaps rightfully. Why talk about something if there is nothing you can do? Shut up and let me get back to Idol. The world sucks bad enough without me having to think about it all the time.

And they are right.

But the former president of Guatemala has just been convicted of war crimes against his own people and sentenced to 80 years, even with the old order still largely in place.  The current president of the country, Perez Molina, has been implicated in the atrocities.  This shows that no revolutionary government is needed to extract justice from a standing system.  None other than the long suffering Mayan Indians, brutalized since the Conquistadors, have blazed the trail.

It's time for a new trick from 9/11 Truth, beyond the "new investigation." The official story is impossible. A mass can only fall at virtual free-fall acceleration through zero resistance. 95,000 tons of steel joints and continuous vertical columns is not zero resistance, unless they were cut into pieces all at once as in a demolition. There is your investigation. Now who did it and why, Mr. Giuliani? Please remember you are under oath.

A Citizen's 20 Points to Drive Home the Truth About 9/11

By James Madison

Here are the basic facts demonstrating why the official story is impossible.  More than ten years later, an enormous number of people have woken up to these facts.

• Most of the steel from the Twin Towers was found far outside the bases of the towers in straight pieces cut cleanly at the ends.  Core beams and perimeter assemblies weighing up to twenty tons were hurled laterally for hundreds of yards at speeds of up to 80MPH.   This is conclusive evidence of explosives demolition rather than gravitational collapse.

• Jet fuel is only kerosene.  Spilled jet fuel burns no hotter or longer on an open surface than ordinary lighter fluid.  The National institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) found no evidence of fires over 480F in tested steel samples.  This  is the temperature of normal office fires.  High-rise furniture and upholstery is fire retardant by law.

• Most of this kerosene blew out in the fireballs on impact.
  
  
• The tower which was hit last, and damaged the least, was the first to disappear.  The plane which struck the South Tower came in at a diagonal and struck a corner of the building, just grazing the core columns.  Almost all the kerosene was lost in the fireball.

• The towers were specifically designed to absorb multiple hits by jetliners approximately the same size and weight of 767s.  Chief structural engineer John Skilling said in 1993:

"Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed, ... The building structure would still be there."

Frank Demartini, the construction manager for the World Trade Center, said in an interview on January 25, 2001:

"I believe that the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door -- this intense grid -- and the jet plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting."

• The jetliner impacts did no significant damage to the steel frames of the towers.  Jetliners are essentially hollow aluminum tubes.  A 767 is approximately 1/2500 of weight of one tower.  The kinetic energy of the planes was absorbed by the much greater mass of the towers.  Aluminum is only one-third of the density of steel.  The photo below shows that the planes were shredded on impact.
  
  
  

• The fires resulting from the plane hits were small and isolated, not "raging infernos."  Just 7 minutes before the collapse of the South Tower, Battalion Chief Oreo Palmer said in a radio transmission from the 78th floor: "Ladder 15, we've got two isolated pockets of fire. We should be able to knock it down with two lines." Two lines refers to two fire hoses.

• No high rise of any kind of construction has ever disappeared from the skyline within seconds as a result of fires, or indeed, as a result of anything but controlled demolition.  In the case of the Windsor fire in Madrid in 2005, in a high-rise of weaker construction than the Towers, the fire burned for 20 hours throughout all floors.  From a standpoint of chemistry and physics, the fuel required to generate the amount of heat-energy needed to raise the temperature of the structural steel to the point of failure was not present. 
  
  
  Windsor fire: Burned for 20 Hours
  
   
  
  9/11: South Tower burned for 52 minutes before destruction.  Black smoke is indicator of oxygen-starved fires going out.
  
  
  

• The amount of kinetic energy generated by the possible collapse of a few floors is not remotely enough to crush 90 stronger floors beneath that collapse.  The difference in these energies is many orders of magnitude.
   

• If the official story is true, then it revolutionizes the steel foundry business.  This industry spends lots of money on blast furnaces which burns lots of expensive coal or coke (refined coal) in an enclosed ceramic chamber.  Pre-heated air is "blasted" through the fuel to raise steel to 5,000F to melt, and nearly that high to become malleable.
  
  
  Twin Tower core backbone under construction
  
  
  

• There have been partial collapses in small sections of steel-framed high-rises, but complete and catastrophic failure in a matter of seconds is impossible except for in controlled demolitions.
  
  
• Falling mass does not accelerate as it accumulates.  The official story relies on a purely imaginary "domino effect" whereby each collapsing floor adds to the overall weight, and drives a "chain reaction."  But this ignores the enormous upward static force of the supporting steel columns, both in the core and in the perimeter, which is much greater than the initial kinetic energy downward.  Accumulating mass could not drive the downward fall faster, because all objects fall through air at the same speed, per Galileo.  Floors which collapse on one another do not go "faster and faster."  They go slower as energy is absorbed.
  
  
• Even if somehow the towers collapsed as a result of fatal weakening, even if the steel got "soft like clay," clay is still is much denser than air. The upper floors could not "fall' at the speed as they would have fallen through thin air.  Study this illustration and word problem:
  
  

  A 9/11 Story Problem: Which 15 story building hits the ground first?

  
  

  
  Answer: On 9/11 both upper blocks hit the ground at virtually the same time, suspending the laws of physics!
  
  -If the 15 story section is falling at free fall speed ...
  
  -All of its gravitational potential energy is converted to Kinetic Energy (movement)
  
  - It is not available to do the work of "crushing" the building below!
  
  - It would have to slow down in order to do any other work, i.e., "crushing 80,000 tons of structural steel below.

• Then there is WTC7.  No plane hit it which would have "weakened the structure" as the official story maintains for WTCs 1 and 2.  There was heavier debris damage and larger fires in many adjoining Trade Center Complex buildings, yet WTC 7 alone fell down dead-level, at virtually free-fall speed, into a neat heap inside its own footprint.
  

• Houses of cards and of building blocks have no solid joints, and therefore offer no resistance as they fall.  The towers and WTC 7 had enormous resistance to stresses and failure at all points in the structures, yet fell as if they were houses of cards.  This illusion cannot be sustained upon even cursory examination.



• The upward static resistance of the vertical steel backbone running up the center of the towers could not have been overcome by a partial collapse of floors.  The towers' "backbone" of 47 steel beams, running continuously up the entire height of the towers, were heavily cross-braced and reinforced so that load would be redistributed in the event of the failure of any single member or members.  This is in accordance with standard design principles.  All modern skyscrapers have a built in "safety factor" of three to five, the ability to withstand three to five times the maximum possible stresses, under extreme conditions, in any direction.  The Towers were most probably even stronger than this.  At the base, the 47 core beams were nearly five feet wide.

• The "domino"-like collapse mechanism, sometimes described as a "pile driver" effect of collapsing floors, is impossible when one recalls that there was nothing actually on top of the 47 core columns, which ran continuously from the ground to the ceiling of the highest floor.  Thinking of the core backbone as  a record player spindle, the stacked vinyl records would represent the floors.  Excessive downward stress on the floors would strip them from the core, like records falling down along the spindle.  There was no compressive force directly atop the core columns.

• There is one scenario under which the countless inconsistencies, puzzles, and anomalies of 9/11 fall into place: that of standard demolition cutter and kicker charges, one of which "cuts" a beam a split second before another one "kicks" it out, as in the following demolition in China.

In the video the Chinese demolition is compared to 9/11, showing startling similarities. Demolition expert Tom Sullivan, formerly of the industry leader Controlled Demolition Inc., has said that the demolitions would have been "no problem."    Sullivan said:

“looking at the building it wouldn’t be a problem — once you gain access to the elevator shafts…then a team of expert loaders would have hidden access to the core columns and beams. The rest can be accomplished with just the right kind of explosives for the job. Thermite can be used as well.”

• The molten steel which flowed in the basements of the towers like a "Dante's Inferno" would be perfectly explained by the use of thermite, an incendiary which melts steel rather than cuts it, in a violent exothermic reaction which can reach 5,000F and could release enough heat-energy to raise the temperature of molten steel to a point which would keep it molten for weeks, even months.  This is similar to the way in which a pot of water which is brought to near boiling stays hot much longer than one heated to just a few degrees above room temperature.  Substances absorb heat, and the more that is absorbed, the longer it takes to cool off.

• The fact that high-grade thermitic compounds, which can only be made in a laboratory, were found, without triggering an investigation of the source, is almost inconceivable.

None of this touches on the "who and why" of 9/11, since that is putting the cart before the horse.  To ask the motive or motives behind a crime, before it has been established that the crime has been committed, is premature.  In this case the crime is a false flag attack blamed on a terrorist network known as Al Qaeda.  Suffice it to say that all wars have beneficiaries.

- JM

Satellite Photo Shows 9/11 Was Inside Job

Aerial view of WTC complex taken on September 23, 2001, before clean-up operations had begun.  For largest detail photo go HERE.

Close up of steel debris

Larger area

For largest detail photo go HERE.

One of the first things Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who coordinated the destruction of the steel evidence at Ground Zero, did after the attack was prohibit almost all photography at the site. Police and FBI agents were ordered to confiscate cameras on the spot, although inevitably, there were simply too many people swarming the crime scene for such a stricture to be successfully enforced.

One key piece of photographic evidence that did survive the government's attempts to keep the public in the dark about what happened that day was an aerial photo taken on Sept. 23, 2001, long before major clean-up operations had begun. Rescue workers and firefighters were still primarily concerned with searching for human remains and even long-shot survivors. The clash between police and firefighters which took place as Giuliani hastened to the "scoop and dump" phase of the operation was Nov. 2.

The aerial photo shows what no other photo could in such clear and convincing detail: that the towers did not collapse down through the line of gravity, but were blown outwards in all directions for two or three times as far as the towers were wide, leaving a carpet of cleanly-cut steel beams and perimeter wall sections across the entire WTC complex. No force imaginable in a downward gravitational collapse can explain the lateral ejection of steel sections with the weight of bulldozers for up to two football fields, at clocked speeds of up to 70 MPH.  

As can be seen in the aerial photo, the steel beam pieces are mostly straight as arrows, un-deformed by heat, and cut neatly at the ends. The steel beams do not wind up in a mound, as one would expect, with the center of the tower's bases as the high point, but rather scattered uniformly across the entire World Trade Center complex, which consisted of seven buildings. Perimeter sections, which consisted of 15-inch wide beam assemblies covered with aluminum cladding, can be seen lying thickly across WTC 6, nearly two football fields away. Each one of these pieces weighed up to 20 or more tons.

The official NIST report explained dust ejections (what are obviously demolition squibs) by saying "compressed air" forced the dust out of breaking windows. But no amount of compressed air can lift 20-ton steel assemblies and hurl them laterally for 400 feet, at 50 to 70 MPH.

Hence the reason for Giuliani's ban on photography at Ground Zero. No amount of instruction in physics or fire temperature calculations would be as dangerous to the official "collapse" theory as plain visual evidence of demolition.  One need only to believe what your eyes are telling you . Steel falls down, not outward for 200 feet and more, at speeds of up to 80 MPH.

The below video narrated by David Chandler gives one of the best views of cut steel beam shooting upwards and outwards, not falling down through the line of gravity. Keeping in mind the massive scale of the towers (nearly a football field wide,) it must be remembered that what seem like tiny sticks are 10 foot long pieces of two-foot wide steel beam and larger, of which even the smallest would weigh nearly one ton.

Here is another view of multi-ton pieces of cut steel beams spinning away from the building as if they were toothpicks.

Circled sections of steel beam are approximately 10 feet long, the height of one story

This rarely seen photo shows the width of the debris field and lateral ejections of steel and pulverized concrete debris, which can be explained only by high explosives.

Perimeter wall sections under construction

Core Beam

 (Note: in satellite photo piece of perimeter assembly is mistakenly identified as having landed outside of WTC 4, shown leaning against it.)

9/11 Science Club: Mass Does Not Accelerate as it Accumulates

The central, reasonable intuition that makes the official 9/11 story at first seem plausible is that as mass accumulates, it must accelerate. The official NIST report depends the idea that as floors collapsed, the mass of concrete and debris accumulated and therefore went faster and faster, that is, accelerated. Greater speed would impart greater kinetic energy, therefore crushing the structure beneath it. There is only one problem with this hypothesis. It is absurd.

Up until Galileo, it was assumed that a 100 pound cannon ball would fall faster to the ground than a 10 pound cannon ball. Galileo said no. Dropped from the same height at the same time, they would fall at exactly the same acceleration, minus negligible differences in air resistance for the two objects of different size.

In fact, Galileo said that, in a vacuum with no air resistance, even a feather would drop at the same acceleration as a 100 pound cannon ball. Experiments in vacuum tubes have proven him right.

Similarly, different masses of concrete would accelerate toward Earth at exactly the same speed. As floors collapsed, it would not go faster and faster, whether the steel was "soft" or not. The idea that the steel was heated to the point of malleability is itself absurd, but even this premise can be granted and it would make no difference. The resistance of 80 floors of steel and concrete must necessarily slow any falling mass, not make it go faster.

This is not to say that it is not reasonable to assume it would go faster. Opponents of Galileo in the European academies argued this vigorously. But in the end Galileo was right. All objects of any weight, falling through thin air, fall at an acceleration of approximately 10 meters per second, per second. This means that for every second an object falls, another 10 meters per second is added to its speed. So if an object falls for 3 seconds, at that point it is going 30 meters per second.

The demolition line of the Twin Towers accelerated downward. The explanation of defenders of the official story is that mass was accumulating, thereby going faster, thereby gathering kinetic energy to break structural supports. But Galileo showed it would not have gone faster. Therefore kinetic energy would not have been gained, but lost as the mass met resistance. Given any significant resistance, the mass of concrete would have decelerated and stopped, as work was performed in crushing each successive floor, thus subtracting from the total amount of kinetic energy, not adding to it. The official story requires the overturning of Galileo.

Galileo Falling Bodies Demonstration

Galileo Falling Bodies Demonstration II: Ball and feather Drop in Vacuum

Which 15-story block will hit the ground first?  On 9/11, they both hit at the same time!

 If the 15 story section is falling at free fall speed ...

•  All of its gravitational potential energy is converted to Kinetic Energy (movement)
• It is not available to do the work of "crushing" the building below!
• It would have to slow down in order to do any other work, i.e., "crushing 80,000 tons of structural steel below. (Source: NaderLibrary.com)

David Chandler's  Brilliant Explanation of Impossibility of Official Narrative

Twin Towers Demolition and Similar China Demolition Side-by-Side