Confirmation That the "Dancing Israelis" on 9/11 Were Mossad, and Knew it Would Happen

First of all it is important to distinguish "proof" from "evidence." Even in a court of law someone is never "proven" guilty, but "found guilty beyond the shadow of a reasonable doubt."  The confirmation contained here derives from major media sources and FBI reports obtained through Freedom of Information Act requests.

The Israelis caught driving around NYC in vans showing traces of explosives, who were seen high-fiving each other as the towers burned, were confirmed to be Mossad agents who had prior knowledge that the towers were going to be hit, before they were hit.

Overview:
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHART...eisraelis.html

The New York Times reported Thursday that a group of five men had set up video cameras aimed at the Twin Towers prior to the attack on Tuesday, and were seen congratulating one another afterwards...They were seen by New Jersey residents on Sept. 11 making fun of the World Trade Center ruins and going to extreme lengths to photograph themselves in front of the wreckage. Witnesses saw them jumping for joy in Liberty State Park after the initial impact (5). Later on, other witnesses saw them celebrating on a roof in Weehawken, and still more witnesses later saw them celebrating with high fives in a Jersey City parking lot.

The respected NYC daily the Jewish Forward and other sources reported:

The FBI will later conclude at least two of the five are Mossad agents and that all were on a Mossad surveillance mission.

ABC News said:

ABC News has learned that after the five men were taken to jail, the entire case was transferred out of FBI's criminal division and into its foreign counterintelligence section, which is responsible for espionage cases. One reason for the shift, according to our sources, is that the FBI believed Urban Moving may have provided a cover for agents of Israeli intelligence.

My opinion: if two were Mossad, they were all Mossad.

Image from "9/11 And the Cover Up: Was Israel Involved in 9/11 Attack? (War by Deception)," By Ryan Dawson



Here are the two, the Kurzberg brothers in the studio audience of the Israeli talk show where one of them said "We were there to document the event." How did they know there was going to be an "event?'




In fact, we know they had prior knowledge that thousands of people were about to be slaughtered, because they had set up a camera on the towers, from Liberty Park, PRIOR to the first plane hit.

Fox News:

The New York Times reported Thursday that a group of five men had set up video cameras aimed at the Twin Towers prior to the attack on Tuesday, and were seen congratulating one another afterwards...

In fact, FBI reports obtained by Freedom of Information Act request show that the men were at the Doric Tower apartments, overlooking Liberty State Park, on the day BEFORE the attacks, scouting out the position. Here is a page from the FBI documents stating that the suspects were seen "in the Doric Towers on the afternoon prior to September 11, 2001" :



Full FBI report on "dancing Israelis" from Chris Bollyn's site:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/62392807/d...ction-1-944861


Evidence of explosives from FBI report:

 

The Mossad agents were eventually ordered released by Michael Chertoff, head of the FBI's criminal division. Chertoff became the first director of DHS. They were deported back to Israel.

What was Mossad doing in NYC in vans full of explosives, and how did they know the towers would be hit? If they knew, why didn't they tell anyone? A warning coming from Mossad would have been taken seriously and the towers evacuated and searched. Why were they flicking cigarette lighters and giving each others high fives as the towers burned?


Dr. Alan Sabrosky's answer: because this sealed the invasion of Iraq, and Iraq was a big problem for Israel.


Police scanner audio of arrests of Mossad agents:

9/11 and the Cover Up: Was Israel Involved? - Ryan Dawson

HistoryCommons Review:
http://www.historycommons.org/contex...01fiveisraelis

3:56 p.m. September 11, 2001: Five Apparent Israeli Spies Arrested for Puzzling Behavior at Time of First WTC Attack



The white van used by five Israeli agents as they were leaving New York on 9/11.Five Israelis are arrested for “puzzling behavior” related to the WTC attacks. Shortly after an FBI lookout bulletin was issued for a van with the words “Urban Moving Systems” written on the side, officers with the East Rutherford Police Department in New Jersey stop the van after matching the license plate number with the one given in the bulletin. According to the police report, Officer Scott DeCarlo and Sgt. Dennis Rivelli approach the van and demand the driver exit the vehicle. The driver, Sivan Kurzberg, does not obey after being asked several more times, so the police physically remove Kurzberg and four other men from the van and handcuff them. They have not been told the reasons for their arrest, but Kurzberg tells them, “We are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are the problem.” Again before the police have made any mention of the 9/11 attacks, another one of the arrested men says, “[W]e were on the West Side Highway in New York City during the incident.” In fact, it will later be determined they were on the roof of a building at Liberty State Park, watching and videotaping the first crash into the WTC (see Shortly After 8:46 a.m. September 11, 2001). [Bergen Record, 9/12/2001; Ha'aretz, 9/17/2001; CounterPunch, 2/7/2007]

The FBI and additional police quickly arrive. They shut down the section of Route 3 in East Rutherford where the van was stopped and evacuate a nearby hotel as a security precaution. [Bergen Record, 9/12/2001] One man is found with $4,700 in cash hidden in his sock, another has two foreign passports on him, and a box cutter is found in the van. [ABC News, 6/21/2002] Another has pictures of the men standing with the burning wreckage of the WTC in the background. [Forward, 3/15/2002]

All five identify themselves as Israeli citizens and claim to be working for the New Jersey-based Urban Moving Systems company. In addition to the driver Sivan Kurzberg, the others are identified as Paul Kurzberg (Sivan’s brother), Oded Ellner, Omer Marmari, and Yaron Shmuel. The men are detained but not charged. [Forward, 3/15/2002; ABC News, 6/21/2002]

The next day it will be reported that “bomb-sniffing dogs reacted as if they had detected explosives.” An investigator high up in the Bergen County law enforcement hierarchy will say in 2006, “There are maps of the city in the car with certain places highlighted…. It looked like they’re hooked in with this [referring to the 9/11 attacks]. It looked like they knew what was going to happen.…It looked like they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park.” [Bergen Record, 9/12/2001] The FBI will later conclude at least two of the five are Mossad agents and that all were on a Mossad surveillance mission. The FBI interrogates them for weeks. [Forward, 3/15/2002] They are held on immigration violation charges, but will be released 71 days later (see November 20, 2001). [ABC News, 6/21/2002]

Dr. Alan Sabrosky, former Director of Studies at US Army War College, General of the Army Douglas MacArthur Chair of Research. Concludes that a combination of treasonous elements in the US government and Israeli MOSSAD orchestrated 9/11, in order to enable invasion of Iraq.

Veterans Hold the Key to 9/11 Truth-Justice

A sample from a high-traffic, middle-of-the-road political forum board, where the hearts and minds are to be won for 9/11 truth-justice movement:

Originally Posted by Bushmaster LMAO! You can "knowlege" from now until the end of time, but the official story will always remain the same. Lol get it? Without application your "knowlege" is worthless. Just like those schmoes who used to do cyber-sex... Without an actual woman they weren't actually having sex, right? Truth movement = same same. And 100 years from now the history books will reflect that.

Official Story: 12 (years) Truth Movement: 0

In other words, even the disinformation artists (we have all run across them) concede that the rational debate over 9/11 truth has been won, by the truth movement, but the people are impotent in the face of enormous evil, and no action will ever be taken. Gloating that the cold-blooded murder of 3,000 Americans will never be avenged, even if what the Truth Movement says is true.

But is this true? Does diabolical evil always triumph over good?

Many regimes have held a far tighter iron grip on their country, and have fallen to rock bottom. During his 40 years in power, if you said Mubarak committed false flags to manipulate the Egyptian people, they would drag you away and pull out your fingernails. Fortunately, America has not yet come to this pass. In America the problem is not so much people not having their freedoms as much as people not using them, although this is gradually changing. Extraordinary rendition for American citizens, upheld by Obama, would put Americans outside the protection of all law, up to and including the threat of being murdered with impunity.

However, one man, a former Director of Studies at US Army War College, sees a road map to prosecution. Dr. Alan Sabrosky, former Marine, says that one constituency has the requisite lobbying power to force action. It is the veterans of the United States Armed Forces.

Sabrosky says the call will not come from the national command of the national veterans organizations, but from the local chapters. The local chapters are more independent and less involved in Washington politics than the national leaderships. Moreover, the call will be broadcast not by the national news organizations, but by their local affiliates, which similarly have different agendas than their national office.

Sabrosky says it is in the power of the local veterans to shake up the logjam which prevents 9/11 Truth from becoming into 9/11 Justice, and to change the political landscape forever. It is inevitably politically unpopular for a congressman to turn a deaf ear to veterans who have served their country, and fought in its wars.

But what to call for, exactly?

Calling for a true investigation has its merits, but can elicit its own feeling of hopelessness. What is to guarantee that a new commission will not be as compromised as the old one? Who will chose what members sit on it? There is a feeling among some 9/11 truth advocates that the public is all “commissioned out.”

But tell the Awake that you are working for a prosecution, and that might get ten minutes of his or her time. Don't tell me you're going to start another commission. We know what happens with those. Those &^%$ belong in jail, period.

Fortunately (but unfortunately for some,) there is a trail of evidence which leads to one participant, to an open-and-shut case. No great crime can succeed without destruction of the evidence, and on 9/11, this task fell to former Mayor of New York Rudy Giuliani.

Contracts were signed, all under the authority of the Mayor of New York, and they are pieces of paper in black and white.

Rudy was a bag man, a low level henchman. But that is where you always start when bringing down a cabal, and that is all we are talking about. Rudy can easily be threatened with 10 years of jail time for felony destruction of evidence in a capital crime. Rudy could chose to do his time quietly, or say who gave him the order to do this, in return for easy time or a grant of immunity. Any prosecutor who has one constituent who was harmed by the crime of 9/11 can bring the case, under the “effects” doctrine of the law.

Best of all, one need not be a 9/11 Truther to find merit in the case. At the very least, this was the unprecedented collapse of three steel-framed high-rises, due to fires, never seen before or since. If only for the lost chance to learn how to make buildings safer, the destruction of 99.5% of the steel evidence was a crime.

Merely bringing the case has multiple benefits. If one falls on the side of 9/11 Truth-Justice, it serves as a warning to future bag men that there will be a price to pay, therefore making the planning of false flag attacks more difficult. That makes us safer. No one wants to be the one to go to jail, where one's lifespan would likely be somewhat shortened. If one is merely interested in making the job safer for our brave firefighters, it would serve warning that such forensic evidence is not to be destroyed.

If Rudy decides not to do his time nicely, all bets are off. All senior ranking members of the Bush administration, including Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Dov Zakheim, and Douglas Feith, would need to be immediately ordered not to leave the country. For the time being.

It's a win-win, and then win some more. What say ye veterans?

James Madison writes under this pseudonym, in the tradition of the American Revolution's Publius, in order that arguments must be judged solely on the merits. He is a graduate of an Ivy League college and a well-known writer.

Why did FBI tip-off Boston suspects, resulting in Collier's death? FBI killed Collier

One thing we know for sure: the FBI knew exactly who the suspects in the surveillance photos were, days before it appealed to the public for help in identifying them. They had been investigating them for the last 2 years. So why did they play dumb and appeal to the public for help in identifying the two men in the surveillance photos, which caused them to flee and embark on the rampage which, according to the FBI, resulted in the death of MIT officer Sean Collier?

The minute those photos came out, every man in the Boston counter-terrorism unit should have said "That's Tamerlan Tsarnaev and his little brother." The Boston counter-terrorism unit had placed Tamerlan on at least one terrorism watch list, had interviewed him in their offices, and investigated his family. It kept getting warnings about him from Russian intelligence, as late as Oct. 2012. Yet on Thursday April 18 at around 5pm, Boston Special Agent Richard Deslauriers, head of the Boston division, held a press conference to release the surveillance photos and said:

"the public will play a critical role in identifying and locating them. Somebody out there knows these individuals as friends, neighbors, co-workers, or family members of the suspects."

Moreover, the M.O. of using pressure cooker bombs, spaced seconds apart, had Chechnya written all over it.   Paul J. Murray, a US counterterrorism expert and author of "Allah’s Angels: Chechen Women in War," told USNI News:

“The same scenario occurs frequently in the North Caucasus, using a single bomb, often in a trash can, then when emergency services arrive, a second bomb goes off, sometimes a third one.”

The rest is history. They knew who the suspects were, and knew where they lived (Tamerlan at 190 Norfolk St. in Cambridge.) They could have surrounded the house and captured or killed them before they panicked and went on the rampage that allegedly killed Collier. Someone tell me how the FBI is not responsible for Collier's death, if in fact the brothers killed him.

Note: the Boston FBI has a history of tipping off notorious criminals who it happens to be working with, like Whitey Bulger.

Surveillance photo released by FBI on Thursday April 18

http://www.fbi.gov/news/updates-on-i...-boston/photos


MIT police officer Sean Collier